Head to Head: .222 vs. .223: 6 Difference Things

Check out our comparison of the Remington.222 and.223 to find out why hunters love these two guns so much. If you look at the two calibres side by side, which one is stronger?

We’ll talk about how each caliber has changed over time, what makes them different, and which one might be best for your needs.

If you’re looking for a new gun, these two may be your last two choices. You’ll have to make a hard decision in this situation.

If you’re not sure which gun will work best for you, this guide should help you decide. So, before we compare them, let’s take a look at where they both came from.

Brief History Of .222 and .223

In 1950, Mike Walker made the.222 Remington. His Remington Model 722 was used in a shooting competition in upstate New York.

Because of this,.222 bullets, which were first made for hunting small animals and shooting from a bench, became the standard.

Even though the.220 Swift and.22-250 Remington were faster and had more power, the.222 had less muzzle blast and barrel wear.

.222 vs. .223

Seven more years went by before the Remington.223 was made. This was made so that the US military could use it as one of their standard rifle rounds. The goal of the project was to make something small and fast.

The Remington Model 760 rifle didn’t debut until 1963. In fact, it was the first thing of its kind to have a chamber made. To put it another way, 223 shots.


Between 1950 and 1964, the first Type.222 and Type.223 cases were made.

Diameter of a bullet-shaped projectile with no rim.

First Produced19501964
Case TypeRimlessRimless
Bullet Diameter.224 in (5.7 mm)0.224 in (5.7 mm)
Overall Length2.130 in (54.1 mm)2.26 in (57 mm)
Max Pressure50,000 psi (340 MPa)62,366 psi (430.00 MPa)
Velocity (60 gr)2,937 ft/s (895 m/s)3,160 ft/s (960 m/s)
Energy (60 gr)1,150 ft lbf (1,560 J)1,325 ft lbf (1,796 J)

Guns used by each round

The.222 and the.223 are both common hunting rifles (specifically varmint). They are still useful for benchrest shooting, regular target practice, and even some types of shooting competitions. We will talk about the following options during both times.

.222 vs. .223

First, let’s look at a few guns that use ammunition made by Remington.

Remington .222 rifles

Remington is a company that makes weapons.

Savage Model 25:  One of the most popular Remington alternatives. The Savage Model 25 is 222. If you want to hunt varmints, you have to have a rifle. If you need to kill pests that are eating your crops or other valuables, you won’t find a better weapon anywhere else.

CZ-USA 527 Lux:

You could enter benchrest competitions with this gun. Small animals can still be hunted with it, though. The standard number of rounds that these rifles can hold is 5+1. (unless mentioned otherwise).

Ruger No 1 Varmint:

If you want a rifle made by a reputable company, a Ruger No. 1 Varmint is a great choice. Most experienced shooters choose the Ruger No. 1 Varmint rifle when they want to hunt varmints.

Some of them have scope mounting rings with a diameter of 1 inch. If you need that much accuracy, get a good scope and then go from there.

Remington .223 rifles

LWRC International IC-SPR: 

At Ruger American Ranch, we do go back to the Ruger brand and rifles. It’s time for the Remington here. 223 gauge. When it comes to hunting small animals, this gun is the only one of its kind. Even if your budget is tight, you can still get one of these bolt actions.

It always gives the results you want and can be trusted. To sum up, the Ruger American Ranch rifle is the one to get if you want a reliable outdoor companion.

.222 vs. .223

FN Herstal SCAR16:

The SCAR16 was a service rifle that was made by FN Herstal. But not long after that, a semi-automatic version of this gun was made for civilians. For a gun with such a short barrel, it is pretty accurate. Also, dependability is guaranteed 100% of the time.

Users did not say that the gun misfired or got stuck. This is a big help for people who have been in similar situations before.

It’s easy to learn and not likely to hurt you, so it’s great for beginners. The SCAR16 is a great choice if you want a rifle with a.223 chamber or just a damn nice gun.

LWRC International IC-SPR:

Lastly, there’s the LWRC International IC-SPR, a gun that could compete with the SCAR16. Especially in terms of how reliable they are. The design of the LWRC International IC-SPR is one of the toughest out there.

But in terms of accuracy, it may not be as good as the other two on the list. It’s not bad by any means. Aside from that, though, it’s pretty reliable and easy to move around.

This gun might be good if you don’t care too much about accuracy. A gun that is great for hunting small animals and could also be used to shoot at targets.

Differences between the 222 & 223 Calibers

Now that you know which guns can use each type of ammunition, it’s time to compare them. Which is the best choice for a shopper who wants to save money?

Find out which is faster, more useful, and stronger. Here’s where things get serious. If you haven’t decided yet, this section might help you do so.

Now, let’s divide this into the following categories:


When it comes to bullets and guns, the.223 is the least expensive. Because of this, rifles that are chambered in.222 cost more.

So, if you want to buy a rifle but have a smaller budget, a.223-caliber rifle is the best choice. Guns and ammunition cost a lot of money. But the answer is clear if you want to save money without giving up quality.

Winner: Remington .223


Let’s see how fast they are compared to each other. A Remington made it. A 50-grain 222 round will move at a very good speed, 3140 feet per second. The muzzle should be able to put out 1095 ftlb.

A 55-grain.223 bullet goes 3240 feet per second and has 1280 foot-pounds of energy at the muzzle. With a difference of 100 fps, it’s clear that the.223 seems to move faster. Keep in mind that it weighs 5gn more and has a higher muzzle energy.

Add this success to the list of things that Remington.223 has done well.

Winner: Remington .223


Hunters have been able to depend on the.222 and.223 for a long time. They have also helped with aiming and sitting on a bench. Both of them are great choices for that task.

.222 vs. .223

The.222 can feel good about themselves because they didn’t fail in any other important ways. Even though the.223 might be shaking its head because it lost again. Fair enough, it does something useful, so it’s a tie.

Winner: Tie


You can probably tell who won this match from the information in the “Speed” section. When you compare the power of the Remington.223 and the.222, the difference is big. So, it’s in a bad spot right now, and we’ll explain why in a second.

Without a doubt, the.223 has the stopping power you need for your small game. If you want to put the hammer down on your opponent, you have to use the real thing.

Winner: Remington .223


As we talked about in the last section, the Remington.223 is powerful but not very accurate. In terms of correctness, it’s not too bad.

Still, you’ll be able to aim exactly where you need to. On the other hand, the.222 shots were pretty close together. If you want a rifle that can hit targets accurately, the Remington.222 is a good choice.

But if you’re thinking about the.308, the.223 isn’t much of a step down. Small differences can sometimes make a big difference.

Winner: Remington .222


From what I can tell about the differences, the Remington.223 is better. Both guns are top-notch, but what really matters is how well they work. When speed and power are important, the.223 is the obvious choice.

The.222 will be more accurate, but it will cost something. Some of your speed and power go down, but when it matters the most, you get more accurate. The.223 is a good choice if you want an inexpensive gun.

Winner: Remington .223

Final Thoughts

Even though the Remington.223 beat the.222 in our comparison test, it’s up to you to decide if you want to buy one. The second one is fine for a day at the range, but the first one is better for a small game hunt. Now all you have to do is look for the right kind of gun.

Leave a Comment